Cases 41 - 50 of 79
Washington v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 1:2008cv00226
Petitioner:
Roderick Washington
Respondent:
Arnold Schwarzenegger and John Duey
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Washington v. CDCR Board of Parole Hearings
as 1:2008cv00220
Petitioner:
Roderick Washington
Respondent:
CDCR Board of Parole Hearings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Washington v. Dovey
as 3:2007cv01959
Petitioner:
Roderick Washington
Respondent:
John Dovey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Washington v. Schwarzeneger et al
as 1:2007cv01791
Petitioner:
Roderick Washington
Respondent:
Arnold Schwarzeneger and James Tilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Washington v. Duvey
as 1:2007cv01615
Petitioner:
Roderick Washington
Defendant:
John Duvey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Washington v. Parole Region III Headquarters
as 1:2007cv01561
Petitioner:
Roderick Washington
Respondent:
Parole Region III Headquarters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Washington v. Dovey et al
as 2:2007cv02072
Plaintiff:
Roderick Washington
Defendant:
John Dovey and Darrel G Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Dovey et al
as 1:2007cv01484
Plaintiff:
Roderick Washington
Defendant:
John Dovey, Darrel G Adams, William McGinness and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roderick Washington v. Parole Region III Headquarters
as 2:2007cv06376
Petitioner:
Roderick Washington
Respondent:
Parole Region III Headquarters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Washington v. Schwarznegger, et al
as 2:2007cv02014
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarznegger, J. Woodford, Allen K Scribner and others
Plaintiff:
Roderick Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
