Cases 41 - 48 of 48
Ooma Inc v. Rates Technology Inc
as 3:2007cv04671
Plaintiff:
Ooma Inc and Ooma Inc
Defendant:
Rates Technology Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Rates Technology Inc. v. Primus Telecommunications Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00441
Plaintiff:
Rates Technology Inc.
Defendant:
Primus Telecommunications Inc. and Primus Telecommunications Group Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Rates Technology Inc. v. Qwest Communications Co. et al
as 1:2007cv00442
Plaintiff:
Rates Technology Inc.
Defendant:
Qwest Communications Co., Qwest Communications International Inc., Qwest Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Rates Technology Inc. v. Shoretel, Inc.
as 3:2007cv01830
Plaintiff:
Rates Technology Inc. and Rates Technology Inc.
Defendant:
Shoretel, Inc. and Shoretel, Inc.
Counter-claimant:
Shoretel, Inc. and Shoretel, Inc.
Counter-defendant:
Rates Technology Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
D-Link Systems Inc v. Rates Technology Inc
as 8:2007cv00144
Plaintiff:
D-Link Systems Inc, D-Link Systems Inc, D-Link Systems Inc and others
Defendant:
Rates Technology Inc and Rates Technology Inc
Counter Claimant:
Rates Technology Inc and Rates Technology Inc
Counter Defendant:
D-Link Corporation, D-Link Corporation, D-Link Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Rates Technology Inc. v. Google Inc.
as 2:2005cv04703
Plaintiff:
Rates Technology Inc. and Rates Technology Inc.
Defendant:
Google Inc.
Counter Claimant:
Google Inc.
Counter Defendant:
Rates Technology Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
RATES TECHNOLOGY V NORTEL NETWORKS
as 04-1212
Defendant-Appellee:
NORTEL NETWORKS CORPORATION
Plaintiff-Appellant:
RATES TECHNOLOGY INC.
RATES TECHNOLOGY V TELE-FLEX SYSTEM
as 00-1184
Plaintiff-Appellee:
RATES TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Defendant-Appellant:
TELE-FLEX SYSTEMS, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
