Cases 41 - 50 of 74
Bartnick v. Ludwick et al
as 4:2016cv00578
Plaintiff:
Michael A Bartnick
Defendant:
Nick Ludwick, William Sperfslage, Rebecca Bowker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams, et al v. Ludwick et al
as 4:2016cv00460
Defendant:
Nick Ludwick, William Sperfslage, Mark Roberts and others
Plaintiff:
Terry J Williams and Michael A Bartnick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamby v. Baldwin et al
as 4:2015cv00276
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Hamby
Defendant:
John Baldwin, Statewide Religion Review Committee, Jerry Bartruff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bitzan et al v. Bartruff et al
as 4:2015cv00217
Plaintiff:
Mark Bitzan and Gary L Buck
Defendant:
Jerry Bartruff, Statewide Religion Review Committee, Dorothy Faust and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bitzan et al v. Bartruff et al
as 4:2015cv00219
Plaintiff:
Mark Bitzan and Cassandra Zent
Defendant:
Jerry Bartruff, Statewide Religion Review Committee, Sheryl Dahm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Legear et al v. Sparks et al
as 4:2015cv00208
Plaintiff:
Christopher Legear
Defendant:
Stephen Sparks, Harbans Deol, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bitzan et al v. Bartruff et al
as 4:2015cv00186
Plaintiff:
Mark Bitzan
Defendant:
Jerry Bartruff, Statewide Religion Review Committee, Dorothy Faust and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bobby Joe Downs v. Nick Ludwick, et al
as 15-1883
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Bobby Joe Downs
Defendant - Appellee:
Nick Ludwick, Rebecca Bowker, Deborah Nichols and others
Jack Hays v. Steve Young, et al
as 14-3804
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jack Hays, And all others similar situated
Defendant - Appellee:
Steve Young, Dave Tadman, Deborah Nichols and others
Charles Cullor v. John Baldwin, et al
as 14-3723
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Charles D. Cullor
Defendant - Appellee:
John Baldwin, Harbons Deol, Sheryl Lockwood-Dahm and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
