Cases 41 - 48 of 48
Jensen, et al v. America's Wholesale Lender, et al
as 10-4147
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD M. JENSEN
Plaintiff:
KRISTEN JENSEN
Defendant - Appellee:
AMERICA'S WHOLESALE LENDER, COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP and others
Chua v. MERS et al
as 2:2010cv00665
Defendant:
BAC Home Loans Servcing LP, Bank Of America, Bank of America Home Loans and others
Plaintiff:
Zita Shing Chua
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Chua v. MERS et al
as 2:2010cv00620
Defendant:
BAC Home Loans Servicing LP, Bank Of America, Bank of America Home Loans and others
Plaintiff:
Zita Shing Chua
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
KELSEY v. BANK OF AMERICA, NA et al
as 1:2009cv02321
Plaintiff:
DENNIS-JAMES KELSEY
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA, NA, RECON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF MARICOPA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Nancy Sitanggang v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., et al
as 09-56700
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NANCY EUW-JONG SITANGGANG
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, INC., COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING, L.P., AKA Countrywide Home Loans, RECONTRUST COMPANY, N.A., AKA Recontrust Company, AKA Recon Trust Company, N.A. and others
KELSEY v. BANK OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2009cv02006
Plaintiff:
DENNIS-JAMES KELSEY
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION and RECON TRUST COMPANY, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property
Dustin Dixon v. CountyWide Home Loans et al
as 2:2008cv00022
Plaintiff:
Dustin Dixon
Defendant:
CountyWide Home Loans, Recon Trust Company, N.A. and Daniel Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
McMenimen v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. et al
as 2:2007cv01624
Plaintiff:
Gary-Charles McMenimen
Defendant:
Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. and Recon Trust company, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
