Cases 41 - 50 of 206
Powers v. Dixon et al
as 3:2023cv01194
Plaintiff:
Clinton Lee Powers
Defendant:
Ricky D. Dixon, Jeffery McClellan, S. Tollick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. DIXON et al
as 4:2023cv00437
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS MARSHALL JACKSON
Defendant:
RICKY D DIXON, JOHNNY FRAMBO and FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenel Joseph v. K. Williams, et al
as 23-13237
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENEL JOSEPH
Defendant / Appellee:
K. WILLIAMS, WARDEN, M. NEAL and others
Jerry Alfred v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 23-13263
Petitioner / Appellant:
JERRY NEIL ALFRED
Respondent / Appellee:
RICKY D. DIXON and SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
McDaniels v. Dixon et al
as 3:2023cv01120
Plaintiff:
Michael J. McDaniels
Defendant:
Ricky D. Dixon, Jeffery McClellan, Captain Beasley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PORTER v. DIXON
as 4:2023cv00419
Petitioner:
WALT MCCOY PORTER
Respondent:
RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Dixon et al
as 1:2023cv23616
Plaintiff:
Douglas Marshall Jackson
Defendant:
Ricky D. Dixon doing business as Secretary, Johmmy Frambo doing business as Chaplaincy Services Administrator for FDC and Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Branchesi v. Dixon et al
as 1:2023cv23580
Plaintiff:
Louis Branchesi
Defendant:
Ricky D. Dixon and Scott Cumbie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
LEE v. DIXON
as 3:2023cv24526
Petitioner:
FRED DOUGLAS LEE, JR
Respondent:
RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pace v. Dixon et al
as 3:2023cv01091
Plaintiff:
Marvin Pace
Defendant:
Ricky D. Dixon, Donald G. Davis, William J. Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
