Cases 41 - 50 of 223
Ramos v. Henry et al
as 1:2023cv00677
Plaintiff:
Rigoberto Ramos
Defendant:
C/O Henry, Sgt. Edwards, Lt. Spencer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stroman v. May
as 1:2023cv00589
Petitioner:
Pernell Stroman
Respondent:
Robert May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Broomer v. May et al
as 1:2023cv00570
Petitioner:
Michael Broomer
Respondent:
Robert May and Kathleen Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Detlef Hartmann v. Attorney General Delaware, et al
as 23-1898
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DETLEF F. HARTMANN
Defendant / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE and ROBERT MAY, Warden
Jones v. Woloshin et al
as 1:2023cv00527
Plaintiff:
Quentin T. Jones
Defendant:
Natalie S. Woloshin esq., Patrick J. Collins esq., Eric H. Zubrow esq. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Woloshin, et al
as 1:2023cv00521
Plaintiff:
Quentin T. Jones
Defendant:
Staff Lt. Orlando DeJesus, Robert May, Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cephas v. May et al
as 1:2023cv00491
Petitioner:
Vernon E. Cephas
Respondent:
Robert May and Kathleen Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Evans v. Jennings et al
as 1:2023cv00477
Petitioner:
Augustus Hebrew Evans, Jr.
Respondent:
Kathleen Jennings, Craig A. Karsnitz, Collins J. Seitz, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Samuel v. May et al
as 1:2023cv00411
Plaintiff:
Harry L. Samuel
Defendant:
Warden Robert May and Centurion LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tejada v. Renington et al
as 1:2023cv00252
Plaintiff:
Ricky Tejada
Defendant:
Correctional Officer J. Renington, Correctional Officer Jaelise Ballestas, Correctional Officer Brandon S. Joiner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
