Cases 41 - 50 of 55
DOUSTI v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2018cv00392
Plaintiff:
SAIED DOUSTI
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES, KIRSTJEN M. NIELSEN and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
JOUMAA v. MNUCHIN et al
as 1:2017cv02780
Defendant:
STEVEN MNUCHIN and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, OFFICE OF FOREIGN ASSETS CONTROL
Plaintiff:
AYMAN SAIED JOUMAA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02628
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
ABDELKADER et al v. EMBASSY OF THE ARAB REPUBLIC OF EGYPT
as 1:2016cv02004
Plaintiff:
SAYED HAGGAG AHMED ABDELKADER and CONCEPCION L ECUACION
Defendant:
EMBASSY OF THE ARAB REPUBLIC OF EGYPT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
JOUMAA v. LEW et al
as 1:2016cv00059
Defendant:
JACOB J. LEW and OFAC
Plaintiff:
ANWAR SAIED JOUMAA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
SAI v. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2014cv01876
Plaintiff:
SAI
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, JOHN S. PISTOLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SAI v. TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2014cv00403
Plaintiff:
SAI
Defendant:
TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
ALGOOD v. VRDOLJAK et al
as 1:2011cv00344
Plaintiff:
MARK ALGOOD
Defendant:
VATROSLAV JAKE VRDOLJAK, IKEMBA IWEALA, SHADY SOUFI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TADAYON et al v. GREYHOUND LINES, INC.
as 1:2010cv01326
Plaintiff:
SAIED TADAYON and BIJAN TADAYON
Defendant:
GREYHOUND LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
SAI v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2010cv00899
Plaintiff:
DAVID KEANU SAI
Defendant:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, HILLARY DIANE RODHAM CLINTON, ROBERT MICHAEL GATES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
