Cases 41 - 50 of 114
Searcy v. HSBC Bank USA N.A. et al
as 1:2013cv02595
Plaintiff:
Alicia Searcy
Defendant:
HSBC Bank USA N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Phelan Hallinan PLC and others
Stroud v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage et al
as 1:2013cv00531
Plaintiff:
Waymon B. Stroud, Sr.
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Home Mortgage , Shapiro, Swertfeger & Hasty LP and Federal National Mortgage Association
Shah v. Shapiro & Swertfeger, LLP, et. al.
as 1:2013cv00031
Plaintiff:
Wahid Shah
Defendant:
Shapiro & Swertfeger, LLP and Does 1-10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv04453
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Glover et al v. Wells Fargo Bank et al
as 1:2012cv02705
Plaintiff:
Leon Glover and Delores Glover
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, Shapiro & Swertfeger, Infinity Mortgage Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Harrison et al v. United States Securities and Exchange Commission
as 1:2012cv02379
Plaintiff:
Ralph H. Harrison
Defendant:
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Consol_plaintiff:
David Zell , Gordon Jones , Joel B. Shapiro and others
Movant:
Georgia's Own Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 3410
Shapiro v. United States Securities and Exchange Commission
as 1:2012cv02384
Plaintiff:
Joel B. Shapiro
Defendant:
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Taylor v. Regions Bank et al
as 1:2012cv02303
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey T. Taylor
Defendant:
Regions Bank , Shapiro & Swertfeger, LLP , Mike Babcock, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Shapiro v. United States Securities and Exchange Commission
as 1:2012mi00101
Plaintiff:
Joel B. Shapiro
Defendant:
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Claypoole v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 1:2012cv02005
Plaintiff:
Amy C. Claypoole
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A. , BAC Home Loans Servicing LP, Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
