Cases 41 - 50 of 106
SHULER v. SECRETARY FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 1:2020cv00010
Petitioner:
SYLVESTER SHULER
Respondent:
MARK INCH and SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SHULER v. LEE et al
as 4:2019cv00516
Defendant:
LEE, MARK INCH, LESLIE CULUMTONIC and others
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA ISSIAH SHULER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COFFEY et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03133
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK ROBINSON, VALONZA DIXON, TRAVIS MORROW and others
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MANNING et al v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2019cv03074
Plaintiff:
PHILIP ARNOLD, JOEL WELTY, RICKY TURNER and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Keyte et al v. Kass Shuler, P.A. et al
as 2:2018cv14115
Plaintiff:
Peter Keyte and Anne Keyte
Defendant:
Kass Shuler, P.A. and Jeffery J Mouch
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
ESTRADA v. JONES
as 5:2018cv00078
Plaintiff:
ALBERT ESTRADA
Defendant:
JULIE L JONES, PAYNE, M NEAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COPELAND v. PARTRIDGE et al
as 4:2018cv00140
Plaintiff:
SHANNON COPELAND
Defendant:
PARTRIDGE, CHAD SMITH, PHINNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Copeland v. Partridge et al
as 5:2018cv00082
Plaintiff:
Shannon Copeland
Defendant:
FNU Partridge, Chad Smith, FNU Phinney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shuler v. Severson et al
as 2:2018cv14027
Plaintiff:
Joshua Issiah Shuler
Defendant:
Lars Severson, Captain Rogers, Officer Eschevarria and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHULER et al v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2017cv00739
Plaintiff:
LONNIE J SHULER and DEBORAH K SHULER
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY , OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC and OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
