Cases 41 - 50 of 122
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00228
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
William Q. Richards Estate v. Caret TX 144, LLC et al
as 7:2022cv00050
Plaintiff:
William Q. Richards, Estate and William Q. Richards Estate
Defendant:
Caret TX 144, LLC, Caret TX 145, LLC, Caret, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Rhythm Energy Inc et al v. Rhythm Solar LLC
as 3:2022cv01137
Plaintiff:
Rhythm Energy Inc and Rhythm Ops LLC
Defendant:
Rhythm Solar LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01064
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Reagins v. Marc Jones Construction, LLC
as 4:2022cv01186
Plaintiff:
Billy Reagins
Defendant:
Marc Jones Construction, LLC d/b/a Sunpro Solar
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
CYBOENERGY, INC. v. APTOS SOLAR TECHNOLOGY, LLC.
as 6:2022cv00281
Plaintiff:
CYBOENERGY, INC.
Defendant:
APTOS SOLAR TECHNOLOGY, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Thomas v. Zenith Solar LLC
as 7:2022cv00047
Plaintiff:
Kelly Thomas
Defendant:
Zenith Solar LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Salaiz v. Encor Solar, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv00045
Plaintiff:
Erik Salaiz
Defendant:
Encor Solar, LLC and Daniel Larkin
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
RM Mexicana SA de CV et al v. Secure Title Latin America Inc et al
as 4:2022cv00392
Plaintiff:
RM Mexicana SA de CV and Marriott Ownership Resorts Inc
Defendant:
Secure Title Latin America Inc and Solar Solimanche SA de CV
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Staeger v. Southern Solar LLC
as 3:2022cv00061
Plaintiff:
Dawn Staeger
Defendant:
Southern Solar LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
