Cases 41 - 50 of 592
Martin v. Astrue
as 1:2012cv00084
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Robert Harvey Martin
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Williams v. Astrue
as 3:2012cv00063
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Plaintiff:
Jerry W. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Lucas v. Astrue
as 7:2012cv00582
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Robertson Lucas
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Rhodes v. Astrue
as 7:2012cv00579
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Preston L. Rhodes
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Edmunds v. Astrue
as 4:2012cv00051
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Barbara Edmunds
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Mabe v. Astrue
as 4:2012cv00052
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Plaintiff:
Gregory M. Mabe
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Campbell v. Astrue
as 2:2012cv00040
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
William Curtis Campbell, Jr.
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Minnix v. Astrue
as 2:2012cv00038
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Cathy K. Minnix
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bowe v. Astrue
as 7:2012cv00577
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Shirley J. Bowe
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Dennison v. Astrue
as 2:2012cv00039
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Chelsea R. Dennison
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
