Cases 41 - 50 of 59
Shawn Stringer v. U S Bank et al
as 2:2013cv00538
Defendant:
Does and U S Bank
Plaintiff:
Shawn Stringer
King v. Chokatos et al
as 1:2012cv01936
Plaintiff:
Darrell Wayne King
Defendant:
John D. Chokatos and Michele Ivy Stringer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Georkeshia Denise Campbell et al v. United States Postal Services et al
as 2:2011cv10741
Defendant:
AT and T, Tamala Alexander, American Express and others
Plaintiff:
Georkeshia Denise Campbell and Kathleen Estes
Siegrist v. California Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2010cv01976
Plaintiff:
Vanalbert Siegrist
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections, James A. Yates, J. J. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 1:2010cv01428
Plaintiff:
Charles A. Miller
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, A. Walker , Z. Ahmed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 1:2010at00581
Plaintiff:
Charles A. Miller
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, A. Walker , Z. Ahmed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Willie Marie Ducre v. Veolia Transportation et al
as 2:2010cv02358
Defendant:
Does, Charles Gatewood, Harold Hollis and others
Plaintiff:
Willie Marie Ducre
Stringer v. Marshall
as 2:2009cv02980
Petitioner:
Lonnie David Stringer
Respondent:
John Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stringer v. Marshall
as 3:2009cv04987
Petitioner:
Lonnie David Stringer
Respondent:
John Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Townsend v. Sisto et al
as 2:2009cv02412
Plaintiff:
William Townsend, Jr.
Defendant:
D. K. Sisto, John W. Haviland, V D Brumfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
