Cases 41 - 50 of 67
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00185
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Valbruna Stainless Inc v. ADT Security Services Inc et al
as 4:2010cv02513
Plaintiff:
Valbruna Stainless Inc
Defendant:
ADT Security Services Inc and ADT Holdings Inc
Counter_claimant:
ADT Security Services Inc
Counter_defendant:
Valbruna Stainless Inc
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv01231
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Gellman v. ADT Security Services, Inc.
as 4:2010mc00237
Plaintiff:
Tobi Gellman
Defendant:
ADT Security Services, Inc.
Movant:
Susan Asmanovs
Tobi Gellman Third Party Subpoena Matter
as 3:2010mc00078
Plaintiff:
Tobi Gellman
Defendant:
ADT Security Services Inc, Diebold Incorporated, Digital Security Controls Inc and others
v. ADT Security Services Inc
as 3:2010cv00937
Defendant:
ADT Security Services Inc
Plaintiff:
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nacol & Co. v. ADT Security Services, Inc.
as 4:2010cv00137
Plaintiff:
Nacol & Co.
Defendant:
ADT Security Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ADS Security L.P. v. Advanced Detection Security Services, Inc.
as 1:2009cv00773
Plaintiff:
ADS Security L.P. and ADS Security L.P.
Defendant:
Advanced Detection Security Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv01881
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Van Peterson Fine Jewelers v. ADT Security Services, Inc.
as 3:2009cv01883
Plaintiff:
Van Peterson Fine Jewelers
Defendant:
ADT Security Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
