Cases 41 - 50 of 72
Shelton v. Harper County Sheriff's Department et al
as 5:2011cv03101
Plaintiff:
Wesley J. Shelton
Defendant:
Harper County Sheriff's Department, Tracy Chance and Kenneth Hobson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frierson v. Roberts et al
as 5:2011cv03044
Plaintiff:
Melvin Frierson
Defendant:
Ray Roberts, Jay Shelton, Sharon Petrie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stevens v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 5:2010cv03224
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lee Stevens
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Shelton Richardson, James Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Green v. Richardson et al
as 5:2010cv03207
Petitioner:
Robert E. Green
Respondent:
Shelton Richardson and United States Marshal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hires v. Shelton et al
as 5:2010cv03094
Respondent:
Jay Shelton and Attorney General of Kansas
Petitioner:
Jack Spencer Hires
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. Richardson et al
as 5:2010cv03044
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Warner Jones
Defendant:
Shelton Richardson and Correctional Corporation of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Smalls v. Stermer et al
as 5:2010cv03025
Plaintiff:
Anthony Maurice Smalls
Defendant:
Scott P. Stermer, D. T. Hininger, Steven Conry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Richardson et al
as 5:2010cv03022
Plaintiff:
Clifford P. White, III
Defendant:
Shelton Richardson, Charles Martin, J. Michael Stouffer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Richardson
as 5:2009cv03234
Petitioner:
Robert E. Green
Respondent:
Shelton Richardson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Shaw v. Richardson et al
as 5:2009cv03178
Plaintiff:
Alton R. Shaw
Defendant:
Shelton Richardson, Robert Mundt, Bruce Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
