Cases 41 - 50 of 155
Mikhail Leontiy v. Mark Nooth
as 18-35590
Petitioner - Appellant:
MIKHAIL LEONTIY
Respondent - Appellee:
MARK NOOTH, Superintendent, Snake River Correctional Institution
Nicholas v. Snake River Correctional Facility
as 2:2018cv01278
Petitioner:
Joshua David Nicholas
Respondent:
Snake River Correction Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jimmie Williams v. Brad Cain
as 18-35422
Petitioner - Appellant:
JIMMIE LEE WILLIAMS
Respondent - Appellee:
BRAD CAIN, Superintendent, Snake River Correctional Institute
Jose Ortiz-Contreras v. Mark Nooth
as 18-35419
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSE ROSENDO ORTIZ-CONTRERAS
Respondent - Appellee:
MARK NOOTH, Superintendant, Snake, River Correctional Institution
Larry Hutchinson v. Mark Nooth
as 18-35295
Petitioner - Appellant:
LARRY DEAN HUTCHINSON
Respondent - Appellee:
MARK NOOTH, Superintendent of Snake River Correctional Institution
Camirand v. Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2018cv00615
Plaintiff:
Scott Leander Camirand
Defendant:
Sgt. Casillas, Department of Corrections and Snake River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barry Barger v. Mark Nooth
as 17-35888
Petitioner - Appellant:
BARRY LOWELL BARGER
Respondent - Appellee:
MARK NOOTH, Superintendant, Snake River Correctional Institution
Timothy McNair v. Maureen Rossi, et al
as 17-35880
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY LUTHER MCNAIR, Minister
Defendant - Appellee:
MAUREEN ROSSI, ROJAS, Ms., B. DOMAN and others
Timothy McNair v. B. Cain, et al
as 17-35834
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY LUTHER MCNAIR, Minister
Defendant - Appellee:
B. CAIN, M. NOOTH, TIMBLIN, Mr. and others
Satya Dasa v. Mark Nooth
as 17-35785
Petitioner - Appellant:
SATYA KRISHNA DASA
Respondent - Appellee:
MARK NOOTH, Superintendent, Snake River Correctional Institution
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
