Cases 41 - 50 of 60
Johns v. Cronic
as 2:2009cv00219
Plaintiff:
Derrick Johns
Defendant:
Steve Cronic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Type:
Other Statutes
Woody v. Cronic et al
as 2:2009cv00173
Plaintiff:
Thomas Franklin Woody
Defendant:
Steve Cronic, Seymore, Underwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Type:
Other Statutes
Wallace v. Cronic
as 2:2009cv00126
Plaintiff:
William Wallace
Defendant:
Steve Cronic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Type:
Other Statutes
Harden v. Hunter et al
as 5:2008cv00443
Petitioner:
Troy Anthony Harden
Respondent:
Danny Hunter, Steve Cronic and Hall County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gallaga v. Cronic
as 2:2009cv00058
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Gallaga
Defendant:
Steve Cronic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garbelena-Olivas v. Cronic
as 2:2009cv00057
Plaintiff:
Martin Garbelena-Olivas
Defendant:
Steve Cronic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woody et al v. Couch et al
as 2:2009cv00010
Plaintiff:
Thomas Franklin Woody, Monica Thomas Holder, Imani Robertson and others
Defendant:
Gerald Couch, Matt Gaudio, Steve Cronic and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alvarez v. Hall County Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2009cv00004
Plaintiff:
Juan Alvarez, Jr.
Defendant:
Hall County Sheriff's Department, Steve Cronic, Mich Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harden v. Hunter et al
as 2:2008cv00228
Petitioner:
Troy A. Harden
Respondent:
Danny Hunter, Steve Cronic and Hall County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cobb v. Cronic et al
as 1:2008cv03058
Plaintiff:
David Aaron Cobb
Defendant:
Steve Cronic, Tealsey, Williamson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
