Cases 41 - 50 of 99
Dobbins v. Reed et al
as 5:2012cv00895
Plaintiff:
Brandon Dobbins
Defendant:
Sheriff Amadeo Ortiz and District Attorney Susan Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mayberry v. Reed et al
as 5:2012cv00897
Plaintiff:
Ali Mayberry
Defendant:
Sheriff Amadeo Ortiz and District Attorney Susan Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Guillory, v. Reed et al
as 5:2012cv00896
Plaintiff:
Ronald Guillory,, Jr.
Defendant:
Sheriff Amadeo Ortiz and District Attorney Susan Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanders v. Reed et al
as 5:2012cv00884
Defendant:
Sheriff Amadeo Ortiz and District Attorney Susan Reed
Plaintiff:
Shawn L. Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flores v. Reed et al
as 5:2012cv00877
Plaintiff:
Reynaldo Flores
Defendant:
Sheriff Amadeo Ortiz and District Attorney Susan Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Reed et al
as 5:2012cv00881
Defendant:
Sheriff Amadeo Ortiz and District Attorney Susan Reed
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Reed et al
as 5:2012cv00882
Defendant:
Sheriff Amadeo Ortiz and District Attorney Susan Reed
Plaintiff:
Gregory Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Reed et al
as 5:2012cv00879
Plaintiff:
Joshua R. Clark
Defendant:
Sheriff Amadeo Ortiz and District Attorney Susan Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnston v. Reed et al
as 5:2012cv00878
Plaintiff:
Jerol Johnston
Defendant:
Sheriff Amadeo Ortiz and District Attorney Susan Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lopez v. Reed et al
as 5:2012cv00876
Plaintiff:
Richard M. Lopez, II
Defendant:
Sheriff Amadeo Ortiz and District Attorney Susan Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
