Cases 41 - 50 of 95
Brown v. Smith et al
as 1:2018cv01790
Plaintiff:
Curtis Darnell Brown, Jr.
Defendant:
Alana Smith, Taylor Swift, Will Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Al-Kassar v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2018cv00495
Plaintiff:
Monzer Al-Kassar
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, S. Julian, FNU Rigsby and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Vance v. Hill et al
as 3:2017cv03312
Plaintiff:
Michael Vance
Defendant:
Michael Hill and Swift Transportation Co of Arizona LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Berglund v. Van Hattem et al
as 1:2017cv09191
Plaintiff:
Michael Berglund
Defendant:
Michael Van Hattem and Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv08675
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hubbard v. Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv08056
Plaintiff:
Bruce Hubbard
Defendant:
Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC, Millwood, Inc. and Niagara Bottling, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Woods et al v. Knight Transportation, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv07330
Plaintiff:
Teresa Woods and Virgil Woods
Defendant:
Knight Transportation, Inc. and/or Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings, Inc. , Knight Transportation, Inc. , Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Woods et al v. Grayson et al
as 1:2017cv07061
Plaintiff:
Teresa Woods and Virgil Woods
Defendant:
Lawrence Grayson, PDS Transportation Services, PDS Express, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Swift v. Muller et al
as 3:2017cv50165
Petitioner:
Aaron Swift
Respondent:
Robert Muller and Lisa Madigan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv04046
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
