Cases 41 - 50 of 130
John and Jane Does 1-104 v. Wasden et al
as 1:2016cv00429
Defendant:
Lawrence Wasden, Kevin Kempf, Terry Kirkham and others
Plaintiff:
John and Jane Does 1-104
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Goodrick v. Idaho Department of Correction et al
as 1:2016cv00243
Plaintiff:
Dan Goodrick
Defendant:
Idaho Department of Correction, Idaho Board of Correction, Brent Reinke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hogue et al v. White et al
as 1:2016cv00085
Plaintiff:
Brian Elliott Hogue, Gary A Butts, Gerald E Lind and others
Defendant:
Corizon Health Services, LLC, Beeken Petty O'Keefe & Company, PharmaCorr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Melaleuca, Inc. et al v. Marquis Aurbach Coffing, P.C. et al
as 4:2016cv00035
Plaintiff:
Melaleuca, Inc. and Melaleuca of Canada, Inc.
Defendant:
Marquis Aurbach Coffing, P.C., Terry Dorfman and Michael Commisso
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hall v. Ramirez et al
as 1:2015cv00488
Plaintiff:
Erick Virgil Hall
Defendant:
Alberto Ramirez, Terry Joe Kirtley and Puga
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joyner v. Christon et al
as 1:2015cv00472
Plaintiff:
Miguel Charles Joyner
Defendant:
B. Christon, Terrie Rosenthal, Clinton E. Blake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seamons v. Ramirez et al
as 1:2015cv00351
Plaintiff:
Gregory Seamons
Defendant:
A. Ramirez, R. Valley, III and Terri Jo Kirtley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. Ramirez et al
as 1:2015cv00305
Plaintiff:
Gregory Nelson and Rosalie I Nelson
Defendant:
Alberto Ramirez, Idaho State Board of Correction, Idaho Department of Correction and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wood v. Colvin
as 4:2015cv00285
Petitioner:
Terry M Wood
Respondent:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Wood v. Colvin
as 4:2015cv00280
Petitioner:
Terry M. Wood
Respondent:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
