Cases 41 - 50 of 514
Tucker v. Donahue
as 1:2023cv00106
Petitioner:
Dwayne Tucker
Respondent:
James Donahue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tucker v. Engel Burman Senior Housing at North Hills, Inc.
as 2:2023cv00735
Plaintiff:
Sharon Tucker
Defendant:
Engel Burman Senior Housing at North Hills, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv08918
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv08919
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv08402
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv08403
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hamilton Advance, Inc. v. Premium Capital Fund et al
as 1:2022cv08347
Plaintiff:
Hamilton Advance, Inc.
Defendant:
Premium Capital Fund, AMRK Enterprises, Madeb Ralph and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
magi halabi
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Civil Remedies: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv08146
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Tucker v. Weeks Marine, Inc. et al
as 7:2022cv07829
Plaintiff:
James Thomas Tucker and James T. Tucker
Defendant:
Weeks Marine, Inc., Weeks Barge 573 and Weeks Barge 533
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30104 Marine Personal Injury - Jones Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv07065
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
