Cases 41 - 50 of 64
Tetter v. Chief US Marshal et al
as 3:2016cv01296
Plaintiff:
David Tetter
Defendant:
Chief US Marshal, Warden and DSCC Director
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garland v. DSCC Director et al
as 3:2016cv01287
Plaintiff:
Delaino Garland
Defendant:
DSCC Director, Warden, Chief US Marshal and others
Movant:
Time Credit Lifeline
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garland v. DSCC Director et al
as 3:2016cv01317
Plaintiff:
Delaino Garland
Defendant:
DSCC Director, Warden, Chief US Marshal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ison v. Chief US Marshal et al
as 3:2016cv01172
Petitioner:
Paul Ison
Respondent:
Chief US Marshal, Warden and DSCC Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ison v. Chief US Marshal et al
as 3:2016cv01141
Plaintiff:
Paul Ison
Defendant:
Chief US Marshal, Warden and DSCC Director
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Osborne v. US Marshal et al
as 3:2016cv01050
Plaintiff:
Ajamu S Osborne
Defendant:
US Marshal, Warden and DSCC Director
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Saulters v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 6:2016cv00025
Plaintiff:
Tommie Edward Saulters, Jr.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, US Marshal Svc, San Antonio and Unknown Officer - U.S. Marshal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Cobble v. Pearce et al
as 4:2015cv02730
Plaintiff:
Daniel Eric Cobble
Defendant:
M. Pearce, United States Bureau of Prisons, US Marshal's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. City of Dallas et al
as 3:2015cv02111
Plaintiff:
Dietrick L Johnson, Sr
Defendant:
City of Dallas, Dallas Police Department, Dallas Police Impound and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davy v. US Marshals et al
as 3:2014cv00367
Plaintiff:
Maurice Eugene Davy
Defendant:
Eugene US Marshals, Mario Campos, Galveston County Sheriffs Dept and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
