Cases 41 - 50 of 116
HAMILTON et al v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
as 2:2018cv00028
Defendant:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. , JAKIR HOSSAIN, USAA INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
MARIJEAN HAMILTON and CLAY TIDWELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. WILLEMS
as 2:2017cv11666
Plaintiff:
USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
HECTOR WILLEMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. CIT BANK, N.A.
as 2:2017cv07454
Plaintiff:
USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
CIT BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PARKER v. USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 1:2017cv03214
Plaintiff:
ALVIN PARKER, JR.
Defendant:
USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY , GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY and ABC CORPS 1-100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MECHOLASKY v. USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2017cv01197
Plaintiff:
STANLEY MECHOLASKY
Defendant:
USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DANIELS et al v. USAA INSURANCE COMPANY
as 3:2016cv08423
Plaintiff:
AARON M. DANIELS and ELLEN DANIELS
Defendant:
USAA INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Insurance Contract
USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. BASEMENTS R US, LLC
as 1:2016cv03371
Plaintiff:
USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
BASEMENTS R US, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
DOTTAVIO v. USAA SAVINGS BANK
as 1:2016cv02282
Plaintiff:
DOTTAVIO and GINO D'OTTAVIO
Defendant:
USAA SAVINGS BANK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DEUTSCH et al v. USAA SAVINGS BANK et al
as 3:2016cv01936
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN DEUTSCH and AVROHAM DEUTSCH
Defendant:
USAA SAVINGS BANK and DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
O'LEARY et al v. USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2016cv01192
Plaintiff:
JEREMIAH J. O'LEARY and PATRICIA KOLODEY
Defendant:
USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
