Cases 41 - 50 of 56
HUERTAS v. WALGREEN CO. et al
as 1:2014cv01877
Defendant:
WALGREEN CO., MILLY'S PHARMACY POWERED BY WALGREEN, LORENZ and others
Plaintiff:
HECTOR L. HUERTAS
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
NEWBILL et al v. WALGREEN CO. et al
as 1:2013cv07479
Plaintiff:
DESMOND NEWBILL , SHAWNA BOYCE and MARY BURTON NEWBILL
Defendant:
WALGREEN CO., CHERRY HILL TOWNSHIP, CHERRY HILL POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GROSS v. WALGREEN CO.
as 1:2013cv06630
Plaintiff:
JOHN J. GROSS
Defendant:
WALGREEN CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RICHMOND v. WALGREEN CO.,
as 3:2013cv02916
Plaintiff:
SIMON NICHOLAS RICHMOND
Defendant:
WALGREEN CO.,
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
WALGREEN CO. et al v. PFIZER INC. et al
as 3:2012cv04115
Plaintiff:
WALGREEN CO. , THE KROGER CO. , SAFEWAY INC. and others
Defendant:
PFIZER INC., PFIZER IRELAND PHARMACEUTICALS, WARNER-LAMBERT COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv07638
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 41 U.S.C. § 1463
WALGREEN CO. et al v. WYETH, INC. et al
as 3:2011cv06985
Plaintiff:
WALGREEN CO. , THE KROGER CO. , SAFEWAY INC. and others
Defendant:
WYETH, INC. and TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
REISS v. WALGREEN CO. et al
as 3:2011cv06372
Plaintiff:
RORI REISS
Defendant:
WALGREEN CO. and DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WALGREEN CO. et al V. PFIZER INC. et al
as 2:2011cv02004
Plaintiff:
WALGREEN CO. , THE KROGER CO. , SAFEWAY INC. and others
Defendant:
PFIZER INC. and WARNER-LAMBERT CO.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
DELORENZO v. WALGREEN CO. et al
as 1:2010cv04378
Plaintiff:
MARIA E. DELORENZO
Defendant:
WALGREEN CO. , BAUDILIO POLANCO, JR., JOHN FREDERICKS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
