Cases 41 - 50 of 796
Garry v. Bean et al
as 2:2023cv01655
Plaintiff:
Remoh Garry
Defendant:
Interim Warden Bean, Brian Williams, Henry Ruckers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tellis v. Suwe et al
as 3:2023cv00489
Plaintiff:
Michael Tellis
Defendant:
Robert Suwe, Richard Ashcraft, Warden Olsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Herrera v. NDOC et al
as 2:2023cv01569
Plaintiff:
Ambrocio Herrera
Defendant:
NDOC, Kitchen Sgt, Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2023cv00469
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lewis
Defendant:
State of Nevada, A.G. Aaron Ford, Director of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cranford v. Warden Williams
as 2:2023cv01462
Petitioner:
Derrick Cranford
Respondent:
Warden Williams and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Coppola v. Chestnut
as 2:2023cv01426
Petitioner:
Joseph R Coppola
Respondent:
Warden Christopher Chestnut
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Barlow v. Rose et al
as 3:2023cv00445
Plaintiff:
Keith Barlow
Defendant:
S. Rose, C/O Adams, David Drummond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ackerman v. Aramark et al
as 3:2023cv00446
Plaintiff:
Jin Ackerman
Defendant:
Aramark, David Drummond, William Reubart and others
Interested Party:
Nevada Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Splond v. Moran et al
as 2:2023cv01391
Plaintiff:
Kenneth R Splond
Defendant:
Moran, Mrs. Howard and Warden Gabriela Najara
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Welch v. Gittere et al
as 3:2023cv00440
Plaintiff:
Kentrell D Welch
Defendant:
Warden William Gittere, Aramark Inc., Raul and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
