Cases 41 - 50 of 96
Whirlpool Corporation v. America Investment and Products Corp. d/b/a AC Parts
as 2:2016cv00561
Plaintiff:
Whirlpool Corporation
Defendant:
America Investment and Products Corp. d/b/a AC Parts
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Whirlpool Corporation v. Vertex Products LLC
as 2:2016cv00563
Plaintiff:
Whirlpool Corporation
Defendant:
Vertex Products LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Whirlpool Corporation v. Global Sourced Products, Inc.
as 2:2016cv00562
Plaintiff:
Whirlpool Corporation
Defendant:
Global Sourced Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Whirlpool Corporation v. Crystal Rose Trading Inc. d/b/a ultimatepurificationusa
as 2:2016cv00560
Plaintiff:
Whirlpool Corporation
Defendant:
Crystal Rose Trading Inc. d/b/a ultimatepurificationusa
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Whirlpool Corporation v. Global Purification, LLC
as 2:2016cv00463
Plaintiff:
Whirlpool Corporation
Defendant:
Global Purification, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Whirlpool Corporation v. Compatible Parts, LLC
as 2:2016cv00445
Plaintiff:
Whirlpool Corporation
Defendant:
Compatible Parts, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Whirlpool Corporation v. PriceBreak, LLC
as 2:2016cv00416
Plaintiff:
Whirlpool Corporation
Defendant:
PriceBreak, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Whirlpool Corporation v. iSave.com, Inc.
as 2:2016cv00418
Plaintiff:
Whirlpool Corporation
Defendant:
iSave.com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Whirlpool Corporation v. Air 1 Supply, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00364
Plaintiff:
Whirlpool Corporation
Defendant:
Air 1 Supply, Inc. and Charlie Tuberville
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Whirlpool Corporation v. Wei et al
as 2:2016cv00229
Plaintiff:
Whirlpool Corporation
Defendant:
Wayne Wei , Rose Lu and Tianjin Jinghai Yunda Industry & Trade Co., Ltd. a/k/a Yunda Industry and Trade Co. d/b/a Yunda Filter Co.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
