Cases 41 - 50 of 56
Gil v. Western Express, Inc. et al
as 7:2015cv09611
Plaintiff:
Clemencia Gil
Defendant:
Western Express, Inc. and Robert E. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Abdul-Azim v. Western Express, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv06584
Plaintiff:
Khalil Abdul-Azim
Defendant:
Rafael Flanagan II and Western Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Metro-North RailRoad v. Western Express, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv06265
Plaintiff:
Metro-North RailRoad
Defendant:
Western Express, Inc. and Joseph Herbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marchese v. Peterson et al
as 1:2014cv00420
Plaintiff:
Frank Marchese
Defendant:
David Peterson and Western Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Quezada et al v. Western Express, Inc. et al
as 7:2014cv00916
Plaintiff:
Jocelin Urena Quezada and Renso Rafael Urena
Defendant:
Western Express, Inc. and Russell Gerome Stanton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Talamo v. Bunch et al
as 5:2013cv00829
Plaintiff:
Charles C. Talamo
Defendant:
Jermaine M. Bunch , Western Express, Inc. and Gypsum Express LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Khan v. Western Express, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00911
Defendant:
David Wayne Gunn and Western Express, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Imtiaz Khan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Rincon v. Western Express, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00136
Defendant:
Willie James Leggett and Western Express, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Leonardo F. Rincon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Boykin v. Western Express, Inc. et al
as 7:2012cv07428
Plaintiff:
Montique Boykin
Defendant:
Western Express, Inc. and "John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Gonzalez v. Hall et al
as 1:2012cv05214
Plaintiff:
Risben Gonzalez
Defendant:
Herbert E. Hall and Western Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
