Cases 41 - 50 of 14,905
Kersey v. Deal Mayor
as 1:2024cv11076
Plaintiff:
George Kersey
Defendant:
Deal Mayor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Roane v. GRMC, Inc.
as 1:2024cv11070
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lee Roane
Defendant:
GRMC, Inc. doing business as Garrett Regional Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Schermerhorn v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv11088
Plaintiff:
Donald Schermerhorn
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Chavez v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv11091
Plaintiff:
Mary Chavez
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Downing v. Johnson and Johnson
as 4:2024cv11080
Plaintiff:
Timothy Downing
Defendant:
Johnson and Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Mohammed v. Universal Protection Services, LLC
as 1:2024cv11066
Plaintiff:
Nubian Nuh Mohammed
Defendant:
Universal Protection Services, LLC, d/b/a Allied Universal Security Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Ryan et al v. HAMMEL Recyclingtechnik GmbH et al
as 1:2024cv11054
Plaintiff:
Lenroy Ryan
Defendant:
HAMMEL Recyclingtechnik GmbH, Procces, Inc. and Process Ohio Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Green v. Covidien, LP et al
as 1:2024cv11055
Plaintiff:
Jessica Green
Defendant:
Covidien, LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bonds v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv11064
Plaintiff:
Alicia D. Bonds
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Booker v. Covidien, LP et al
as 1:2024cv11062
Plaintiff:
Philip Booker
Defendant:
Covidien, LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
