Cases 41 - 50 of 221
Mitchell et al v. Marshall et al (JOINT ASSIGN) (MAG+)
as 2:2017cv00768
Defendant:
Steven T. Marshall, County of Barbour, Alabama, Alabama Administrative Office of Courts and others
Plaintiff:
Miranda M. Mitchell and D.G.M.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12181 Americans with Disabilities Act-Public Accommodations Private
Lett v. Garden City Group, LLC (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG+)
as 2:2018cv00125
Plaintiff:
Rickey Lett
Defendant:
Garden City Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fluidmaster, Inc. v. Alfa Insurance Group
as 2:2018cv00118
Plaintiff:
Fluidmaster, Inc.
Defendant:
Alfa Insurance Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Stokes v. Credit One Bank (MAG+)
as 2:2018cv00051
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Stokes, III
Defendant:
Credit One Bank
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Stokes v. M&T Bank et al (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG+)
as 2:2018cv00049
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Stokes, III
Defendant:
M&T Bank and Barrett Daffin Frappier Turner & Engel, LLP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Stokes v. Wells Fargo (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG+)
as 2:2018cv00048
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Stokes, III
Defendant:
Wells Fargo
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Stokes v. Navient Department of Education Loan Servicing (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG+)
as 2:2018cv00047
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Stokes, III
Defendant:
Navient Department of Education Loan Servicing
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Stokes v. Santander Consumer USA (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG+)
as 2:2018cv00050
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Stokes, III
Defendant:
Santander Consumer USA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Cincinnati Insurance Company v. New England Retail Express (CONSENT)
as 3:2017cv00822
Plaintiff:
Cincinnati Insurance Company
Defendant:
New England Retail Express
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Varner et al v. Caliber Home Loans (MAG+)
as 1:2017cv00773
Plaintiff:
Brenda F. Varner and Dwight Varner
Defendant:
Caliber Home Loans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
