Cases 41 - 50 of 6,985
(PC) Page v. Navarrete
as 5:2024cv01424
Plaintiff:
Richard Lawrence Page
Defendant:
Jorge E. Navarrete
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randle v. Fregi et al
as 3:2024cv02098
Plaintiff:
Ramello Randle
Defendant:
Matthew Fregi and John Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randle v. Contra Costa County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2024cv02099
Plaintiff:
Ramello Randle
Defendant:
Contra Costa County Sheriff's Department, Beltran, Jensen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flournoy v. Wade
as 3:2024cv02101
Plaintiff:
James Henry Flournoy, Jr.
Defendant:
Kathryn Wade
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrison v. City and County of San Francisco et al
as 3:2024cv02090
Plaintiff:
Marquez Harrison
Defendant:
City and County of San Francisco, Chang, Ng and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lovell v. Sanchez et al
as 3:2024cv02071
Plaintiff:
David Anthony Lovell, II
Defendant:
Deputy Sanchez and Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coffer v. Reyes et al
as 4:2024cv02051
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Christopher Coffer
Defendant:
Officer Reyes, Deleon and R. Gamboa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sivak v. Burdick et al
as 3:2024cv02059
Plaintiff:
Lacey Sivak
Defendant:
Roger Burdick, Amanda K. Brailsford, William A. Fletcher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duckett v. Garcia
as 5:2024cv01999
Plaintiff:
James Maurice Duckett and Jamesha Duckett
Defendant:
P. Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodgers et al v. Keefe Commissary Network Sales
as 3:2024cv01998
Plaintiff:
Kyle B. Rodgers, Michael Dean Rodgers and Albert L. Martinez
Defendant:
Keefe Commissary Network Sales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
