Cases 41 - 50 of 253
Super Store Industries v. Bumble Bee Foods LLC et al
as 3:2017cv00950
Plaintiff:
Super Store Industries
Defendant:
Bumble Bee Foods LLC, Starkist Company , Dongwon Industries Co. Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001
Goode et al v. The State of California
as 3:2017cv00736
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Goode , Sr., Robert L. Goode, Jr., Samya R. Goode and others
Defendant:
California, State of
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0014
Kreuzer v. Qualcomm Incorporated
as 3:2017cv00526
Plaintiff:
David Kreuzer
Defendant:
Qualcomm Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002
Frederick et al v. Qualcomm Incorporated
as 3:2017cv00377
Plaintiff:
Scott Frederick , Charles Poon , Andrea Hogan and others
Defendant:
Qualcomm Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002
Herrera et al v. Qualcomm Incorporated
as 3:2017cv00273
Plaintiff:
Armando Herrera , Eden Wagner and Neil Wagner
Defendant:
Qualcomm Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337
Rotman et al v. Qualcomm Incorporated
as 3:2017cv00260
Plaintiff:
Allan Rotman , Shari Cole , Phillip James Zacharias and others
Defendant:
Qualcomm Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002
Carroll et al v. Qualcomm Incorporated
as 3:2017cv00216
Plaintiff:
Daniel Carroll , Debra Grasl and Amanda Newsome
Defendant:
Qualcomm Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002
Aya Healthcare Services, Inc. et al v. AMN Healthcare, Inc.
as 3:2017cv00205
Plaintiff:
Aya Healthcare Services, Inc. and Aya Healthcare, Inc.
Defendant:
AMN Healthcare, Inc. , AMN Healthcare Service, Inc. , AMN Services, LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001
Hadnett v. Qualcomm Incorporated
as 3:2017cv00197
Plaintiff:
Alicia Hadnett
Defendant:
Qualcomm Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002
Schwartz et al v. Qualcomm Incorporated
as 3:2017cv00166
Plaintiff:
Jason Schwartz , Suzanne Block , Kevin Calero and others
Defendant:
Qualcomm Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0015
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
