Cases 41 - 50 of 14,073
YOUNG v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 4:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
DAVHON YOUNG and DA'VHON YOUNG
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CASEY v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 4:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
BRIAN CASEY
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GAPHOOR v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
DAVE GAPHOOR
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TATE v. OKALOOSA CORRECTION INSTITUTION
as 3:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE KEVIN TATE, III
Defendant:
OKALOOSA CORRECTION INSTITUTION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PETERS v. DIXON
as 4:2024cv00094
Petitioner:
JEREMIE ODELL PETERS
Respondent:
RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DAVIS v. QUINN et al
as 3:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
DIONTE JERMAINE DAVIS and CHRISTOPHER HORTEN
Defendant:
R QUINN, C HORTEN, K EMMIT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. DIXON
as 4:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
TONY C. JACKSON, JR.
Defendant:
SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Petitioner:
TONY C JACKSON, JR
Respondent:
RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TANNER v. FRENCH et al
as 3:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
ALPHONSO TARODD TANNER
Defendant:
FRENCH, DIRECTOR CURRY, SKKRUBS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HILL v. WARDEN JEFFERSON CI
as 4:2024cv00164
Petitioner:
REGINALD HILL
Respondent:
WARDEN JEFFERSON CI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KNOX v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 4:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL KNOX
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
