Cases 41 - 50 of 3,125
SHERIDAN v. LITTLE
as 3:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J SHERIDAN
Defendant:
BRAD J LITTLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FIGG et al v. FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION et al
as 4:2024cv00129
Plaintiff:
LINDA FIGG, FIGG GROUP INC, FIGG BRIDGE INSPECTION INC and others
Defendant:
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION and HARI KALLA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
KING v. UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT et al
as 1:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND LEE KING
Defendant:
UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, US TREASURY, TUWANDA F WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MORGAN et al v. BAY COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT et al
as 5:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
CRAIG MORGAN and JALESSEY POOLE
Defendant:
BAY COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT, BAY COUNTY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, ALVIN ILER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RODGERS v. DEJOY
as 3:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
MYELICIA RODGERS
Defendant:
LOUIS DEJOY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
TUCKER v. YELLEN
as 1:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
ASHLEE MARIE TUCKER
Defendant:
JANET LOUISE YELLEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TUCKER v. HUNNICUTT
as 1:2024cv00008
Defendant:
MARTHA ALLISON HUNNICUTT, M ALLISON HUNNICUTT and ALLISON HUNNICUTT
Plaintiff:
JASON DAVID TUCKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FORD v. MCNEILL et al
as 4:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
ALONZO FORD
Defendant:
MAC MCNEILL, MAURICE ARNOLD and DUSTIN MCCOY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BUSBY v. JOHNSON
as 3:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
JEREMY BUSBY
Defendant:
BOB JOHNSON, JOHN DOE 1 and JOHN DOE 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CASEY v. AT&T INC et al
as 5:2023cv00318
Plaintiff:
JOHNNIE LEE CASEY
Defendant:
AT&T INC, INDENTURE TRUSTEE, THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY NA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
