Cases 41 - 50 of 5,346
Reid v. Campbell
as 5:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
Michael Shane Reid
Defendant:
Wesley Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Odom v. Beard et al
as 3:2024cv00233
Plaintiff:
Glenn D. Odom
Defendant:
Jessica Beard, Damon Preston and Mr. Kenny
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brodie v. USA
as 5:2024cv00063
Petitioner:
Andre M. Brodie
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Scott v. Embry et al
as 1:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Versace Alan Scott
Defendant:
Randi Thomas Embry, Luke Whittaker, Shawn Embry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Cain v. Marshall et al
as 5:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cain
Defendant:
Captin Thomas Marshall, Jailer Ken Claud, Comprehensive Correctional Care and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Poling v. USA
as 3:2024cv00227
Petitioner:
Randol Allen Poling, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Reid v. Harmon et al
as 1:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Michael Shane Reid
Defendant:
Stephen Harmon, Comprehensive Correctional Care and Nora Janes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Cook et al
as 5:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Cindy Mitchell
Defendant:
Detective Dylan Cook, Detective Beau Green and Sgt. Matthew Scheer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Perkins v. Dallam et al
as 3:2024cv00226
Plaintiff:
Gavin Perkins
Defendant:
Ramsey Dallam, Steve Conrad, Detective Snyder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cain v. Comprehensive Correctional Care et al
as 5:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cain
Defendant:
Comprehensive Correctional Care, Nurse Provider Leesia Smith, Ken Claud and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
