Cases 41 - 50 of 66
Spire STL Pipeline LLC v. 0.99 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri et al
as 4:2018cv01369
Defendant:
0.99 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri, Mary E. Mintert, City of West Alton and others
Plaintiff:
Spire STL Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Spire STL Pipeline LLC v. 0.47 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri et al
as 4:2018cv01368
Defendant:
0.38 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri, Carol J. Connoyer, Eugene E. Beckham & Janet L. Beckham Revocable Trust and others
Plaintiff:
Spire STL Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Spire STL Pipeline LLC v. 0.34 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Louis County, State of Missouri et al
as 4:2018cv01521
Defendant:
Eugene Weidner and Joyce Weidner Revocable Trust, dated October 26, 1999, 0.34 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Louis County, State of Missouri, Eugene Weidner, as Trustee of Eugene Weidner and Joyce Weidner Revocable Trust, dated October 26, 1999 and others
Plaintiff:
Spire STL Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Spire STL Pipeline LLC v. 1.37 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri et al
as 4:2018cv01334
Defendant:
1.06 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri, 0.82 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri, Little Farm, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Spire STL Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Spire STL Pipeline LLC v. 1.78 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri et al
as 4:2018cv01363
Defendant:
Stanolind Pipe Line Co., Kathleen C. Thomas, TransCanada Keystone Pipeline, LP and others
Plaintiff:
Spire STL Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Spire STL Pipeline LLC v. 2.49 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri et al
as 4:2018cv01366
Defendant:
2.49 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri, City of Portage des Sioux, 1.99 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri and others
Plaintiff:
Spire STL Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Spire STL Pipeline LLC v. 2.27 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri et al
as 4:2018cv01342
Defendant:
5.72 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri, 2.27 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri, 0.51 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri and others
Plaintiff:
Spire STL Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Spire STL Pipeline LLC v. 3.22 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri et al
as 4:2018cv01350
Defendant:
1.56 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri, Portage Des Sioux, City of, Collector of Revenue of St. Charles County and others
Plaintiff:
Spire STL Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Spire STL Pipeline LLC v. 0.67 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri et al
as 4:2018cv01352
Defendant:
Collector of Revenue of St. Charles County, Gerald A. Rothermich, 0.54 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri and others
Plaintiff:
Spire STL Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Spire STL Pipeline LLC v. 1.18 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri et al
as 4:2018cv01353
Defendant:
Shell Pipe Line Corporation, Stanolind Pipe Line Co., 0.59 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri and others
Plaintiff:
Spire STL Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
