Cases 41 - 50 of 1,282
Craig II v. U.S. Customs and Border Protection
as 3:2023cv01189
Plaintiff:
Tracy Lee Craig II
Defendant:
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2403 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Keading et al v. Keading
as 3:2023cv03036
Plaintiff:
Hilja Keading and Keading Family Trust
Defendant:
Kenton Keading
Johnson v. Watkin et al
as 1:2023at00479
Plaintiff:
Daymon Johnson
Defendant:
Steve Watkin, Richard McCrow, Thomas J. Burke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Watkin et al
as 1:2023cv00848
Plaintiff:
Daymon Johnson
Defendant:
Steve Watkin, Richard McCrow, Thomas J. Burke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
The Personal Care Products Council v. Bonta
as 2:2023cv01006
Plaintiff:
The Personal Care Products Council
Defendant:
Rob Bonta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
The Personal Care Products Council v. Bonta
as 2:2023at00499
Plaintiff:
The Personal Care Products Council
Defendant:
Rob Bonta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
National Shooting Sports Foundation v. Bonta
as 3:2023cv00945
Plaintiff:
National Shooting Sports Foundation
Defendant:
Rob Bonta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Richard J Koppel v. Robert Bonta et al
as 8:2023cv00813
Plaintiff:
Richard J. Koppel
Defendant:
Robert Bonta, Don Barnes and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Richards et al v. Bonta et al
as 3:2023cv00793
Plaintiff:
Claire Richards, Alisha Curtin, Dakota Adelphia and others
Defendant:
Rob Bonta and Allison Mendoza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Eric Ray Malone v. Palm Springs Police Department
as 5:2023cv00770
Plaintiff:
Eric Ray Malone
Defendant:
Palm Springs Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
