Antitrust Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of California
Cases 41 - 50 of 253
Kreuzer v. Qualcomm Incorporated
as 3:2017cv00526
Plaintiff: David Kreuzer
Defendant: Qualcomm Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002
Frederick et al v. Qualcomm Incorporated
as 3:2017cv00377
Plaintiff: Scott Frederick , Charles Poon , Andrea Hogan and others
Defendant: Qualcomm Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002
Herrera et al v. Qualcomm Incorporated
as 3:2017cv00273
Plaintiff: Armando Herrera , Eden Wagner and Neil Wagner
Defendant: Qualcomm Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337
Rotman et al v. Qualcomm Incorporated
as 3:2017cv00260
Plaintiff: Allan Rotman , Shari Cole , Phillip James Zacharias and others
Defendant: Qualcomm Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002
Carroll et al v. Qualcomm Incorporated
as 3:2017cv00216
Plaintiff: Daniel Carroll , Debra Grasl and Amanda Newsome
Defendant: Qualcomm Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002
Aya Healthcare Services, Inc. et al v. AMN Healthcare, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00205
Plaintiff: Aya Healthcare Services, Inc. and Aya Healthcare, Inc.
Defendant: AMN Healthcare, Inc. , AMN Healthcare Service, Inc. , AMN Services, LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001
Hadnett v. Qualcomm Incorporated
as 3:2017cv00197
Plaintiff: Alicia Hadnett
Defendant: Qualcomm Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002
Schwartz et al v. Qualcomm Incorporated
as 3:2017cv00166
Plaintiff: Jason Schwartz , Suzanne Block , Kevin Calero and others
Defendant: Qualcomm Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0015
Mackay et al v. Qualcomm Incorporated
as 3:2017cv00148
Plaintiff: Michelle Mackay , Colleen Sparke , Janet Silverness and others
Defendant: Qualcomm Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002
Miller v. Qualcomm Incorporated
as 3:2017cv00147
Plaintiff: Rachel L. Miller
Defendant: Qualcomm Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?