Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Cases 41 - 50 of 14,062
WOOD v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 4:2024cv00163
Plaintiff: CHARITY NOELLE WOOD
Defendant: STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
YOUNG v. WCTV NEWS CHANNEL
as 4:2024cv00161
Plaintiff: DA'VHON YOUNG
Defendant: WCTV NEWS CHANNEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EVANS v. LEBLANC et al
as 4:2024cv00160
Plaintiff: PARIS DEMETRIUS EVANS
Defendant: BOB LEBLANC, GARY E MOLEK, HEATHER DANIELLE PASTOOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RUTLEDGE v. DEVORE-GUIFARRO et al
as 1:2024cv00059
Defendant: BRACHER, E DEVORE-GUIFARRO, BODIFORD and others
Plaintiff: EDDIE VINCENT RUTLEDGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DIXON v. DYKES et al
as 3:2024cv00079
Plaintiff: JOSEPH JAMES DIXON, JR
Defendant: TRAVIS EARL DYKES, JONATHAN L CARTER, TYLER MARIE MCCRANIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MICHAEL v. DESANTIS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2024cv00057
Plaintiff: LINDA MICHAEL
Defendant: RON DESANTIS, THOMAS BAKKEDAHL and CYNTHIA COX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LYNN v. DIXON
as 4:2024cv00055
Petitioner: HENRY LYNN
Respondent: RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00050
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
COLVIN v. SECRETARY FDOC
as 3:2024cv00142
Petitioner: CHARLES COLVIN, JR
Respondent: SECRETARY FDOC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HICKS v. DIXON
as 5:2024cv00068
Petitioner: SCOTT HICKS
Respondent: RICKEY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?