Cases 41 - 50 of 51
Weaver v. Mailing Enterprises Inc et al
as 2:2008cv01032
Plaintiff:
John Jacob Weaver, IV
Defendant:
Mailing Enterprises Inc, Mailing Enterprises Inc, Mailing Enterprises Inc and others
Cross Claimant:
Mailing Enterprises Inc
Cross Defendant:
FedEx Corporation
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sanofi-Aventus US Inc et al v. Federal Express Corporation
as 9:2008cv00596
Plaintiff:
Sanofi-Aventus US Inc and Sanofi-Pasteur Inc
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 11702 (a)(4) Violations of Interstate Commerce A
Roschen et al v. Wheaton World Wide Moving
as 9:2008cv00578
Plaintiff:
William Roschen and Victoria T Roschen
Defendant:
Wheaton World Wide Moving
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Interstate Commerce Act
United Energy Distributors Inc v. ConocoPhillips Company
as 1:2007cv02644
Plaintiff:
United Energy Distributors Inc, United Energy Distributors Inc and United Energy Distributors Inc
Defendant:
ConocoPhillips Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2801 Petroleum Marketing Practices Act
Bradford v. Greyhound Lines Inc
as 2:2006cv01032
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 11702 (a)(4) Violations of Interstate Commerce A
Hansa Meyer Transport GMBH & Co KG v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 8:2006cv00924
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 11702 (a)(4) Violations of Interstate Commerce A
Breen et al v. Collectcorp Corporation
as 4:2006cv00024
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Parks Automotive Group Incorporated v. General Motors Corporation
as 9:2005cv01504
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
SC State v. Bulgartabac Holding
as 3:2005cv00124
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Declaratory Judgment
Chapin, et al v. Bekins Van Lines LLC, et al
as 6:2004cv22397
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Interstate Commerce Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
