Cases 51 - 60 of 418
JONES v. EUSTICE et al
as 5:2023cv00140
Plaintiff:
JEREMY A JONES
Defendant:
BRIAN M EUSTICE, L BENTLEY, D GEORGE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv16782
Plaintiff:
HEATH DANIEL SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HEATH v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv16549
Plaintiff:
CORINTHIANS HEATH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RUNGE v. DESANTIS et al
as 5:2023cv00113
Plaintiff:
LARRY RUNGE
Defendant:
RON DESANTIS, RICKY DIXON, HEATH HOLLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KEY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv15222
Plaintiff:
HEATH KEY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Warner v. Seminole County et al
as 6:2023cv00787
Plaintiff:
Jamie C. Warner
Defendant:
Seminole County, Dennis Lemma, City of Sanford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spagnuolo v. Insurance Office of America, Inc. et al
as 6:2023cv00746
Plaintiff:
Louis Spagnuolo
Defendant:
Insurance Office of America, Inc., Valli S. Ritenour, John K. Ritenour and others
Not Classified By Court:
Bill Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Racketeering (RICO)
FLANAGAN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv13690
Plaintiff:
HEATH FLANAGAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Heath v. DoorDash, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00407
Plaintiff:
Richard L. Heath
Defendant:
DoorDash, Inc. and Henry Van Fleet
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Insurance Contract
HART v. HOLLAND et al
as 5:2023cv00075
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN HARTMAN and BENJAMIN ESTABON CARLITO HART
Defendant:
HEATH HOLLAND, JOSEPH FLOYD, B SHOUPPE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
