Cases 51 - 60 of 72
Rodhouse et al v. Skechers USA, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00471
Plaintiff:
Sarah Rodhouse , Misty Mackey , Sharon Mavis and others
Defendant:
Skechers U.S.A., Inc. , Skechers U.S.A., Inc. II and Skechers Fitness Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gutierrez-Morales et al v. Planck et al
as 5:2015cv00158
Plaintiff:
Cecilio Gutierrez-Morales , Marcos Moron-Blas , Omar Perez-Morales and others
Defendant:
Earl Lee Planck, Jr., B. S. Land and Cattle Company, LLC, Chad Price and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Murillo et al v. Dillard
as 1:2015cv00069
Plaintiff:
Martin Rico Murillo , Ageo Avelino Naez , Agustin Andres Juana and others
Defendant:
Tracy Dillard
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Perez v. Shivam Hospitality, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv00066
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Shivam Hospitality, LLC , Mahesh Nichani and Saurabh Taneja
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Martin-Perez v. Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00959
Plaintiff:
Tara Martin-Perez
Defendant:
Skechers, U.S.A., Inc., Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. II and Skechers Fitness Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Perez v. JAO Enterprises, LLC et al
as 2:2014cv00048
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
JAO Enterprises, LLC, Jaime Magana, Abel Leon and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Perez v. Sepanek
as 0:2014cv00038
Petitioner:
Israel Perez
Respondent:
Michael Sepanek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Perez v. Rodabaugh et al
as 3:2013cv01122
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Andrew Clyde Rodabaugh , A.R.E. Machine Products, Inc. and A.R.E. Machine Products, Inc. 401(k) Retirement Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Perez v. Off Duty Police Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00935
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Off Duty Police Services, Inc., Darrell Spurgeon and Bonnie Spurgeon
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Morales v. USA
as 3:2013cv07314
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Perez J. Morales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
