Cases 51 - 55 of 55
Peterson v. Islamic Republic of Iran
as 3:2008mc80030
Plaintiff:
Deborah D. Peterson
Defendant:
Islamic Republic of Iran
Garnishee:
Clearstream Banking, S.A.
Petitioner:
World Bank
3Rd Party Defendant:
Japan Bank for International Cooperation, Non-Party CMA CGM, Non-Party A.P. Moller-Maersk A/S and others
Interested Party:
The Export-Import Bank of Korea, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, ABN AMRO Bank N.V. and others
Amicus Curiae:
California Bankers Association, the Institute of International Bankers, the International Bankers Association in California and others
Not Classified By Court:
International Finance Corporation
Johnson & Johnson et al v. Azam International Trading et al
as 1:2007cv04302
Defendant:
Al-Shafiq Electronics LLC, Muhammad Hamid Hamid Butt, Mohammed Ramzan and others
Plaintiff:
Johnson & Johnson and LifeScan, Inc.
Interested Party:
ABN Amro Bank N.V.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv07413
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Bank of America Corporation v. ABN Amro Bank N.V. et al
as 1:2007cv03578
Plaintiff:
Bank of America Corporation
Defendant:
ABN Amro Bank N.V. and ABN Amro Holdings N.V.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Motorola Corporation, et al v. Uzan, et al
as 1:2002cv00666
Plaintiff:
Motorola Credit Corporation and Nokia Corporation
Petitioner:
Credit Lyonnais, UBS AG, Bruce G. Howell and others
Defendant:
Kemal Uzan, Cem Cengiz Uzan, Murat Hakan Uzan and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Sinan Uzan
Counter Defendant:
Motorola, Inc., Kroll Associates, Inc., Christopher B. Galvin and others
Interested Party:
Hellenic Partners LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
