Cases 51 - 60 of 1,127
Thomas v. Astrue
as 4:2012cv00179
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Thomas
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Futrell v. Astrue
as 4:2013cv00025
Plaintiff:
Jacquline M. Futrell
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Lucas v. Astrue
as 7:2012cv00582
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Robertson Lucas
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Futrell v. Astrue
as 2:2012cv00634
Plaintiff:
Jacquline M. Futrell
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Rhodes v. Astrue
as 7:2012cv00579
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Preston L. Rhodes
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Edmunds v. Astrue
as 4:2012cv00051
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Barbara Edmunds
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Mabe v. Astrue
as 4:2012cv00052
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Plaintiff:
Gregory M. Mabe
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Campbell v. Astrue
as 2:2012cv00040
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
William Curtis Campbell, Jr.
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Minnix v. Astrue
as 2:2012cv00038
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Cathy K. Minnix
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bowe v. Astrue
as 7:2012cv00577
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Shirley J. Bowe
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
