Cases 51 - 60 of 73
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv06018
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Aldrich et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv03815
Plaintiff:
Marie J. Aldrich, Leonel R. Alvarez, Sarah Arensman and others
Defendant:
John Does 1 through 3 and SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv03637
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Barrow v. City of New York et al
as 1:2012cv02820
Plaintiff:
Leonard Barrow
Defendant:
City of New York, Detective Christopher Goodwin and John and Jane Doe 1 thorugh 10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv02766
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Colon v. Major Perry Street Corp. et al
as 1:2012cv03788
Plaintiff:
Rudy Colon
Defendant:
Major Perry Street Corp., Major 10th Street Realty Corp., M&E E 52 Barrow LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv02849
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Griffin et al v. Stone Buddah Music, LLC et al
as 1:2012cv01897
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Griffin , Jack Sample Productions, LLC , Marlon Barrows and others
Defendant:
Stone Buddah Music, LLC and BMG Rights Management (U.S.), LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01298
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv09061
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 157
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
