Cases 51 - 60 of 68
Abdul Ayat Mohammed Bey v. Nancy Pelosi et al
as 2:2008cv06872
Plaintiff:
Abdul Ayat Mohammed Bey
Defendant:
Nancy Pelosi, Nancy Pelosi, Barbara Boxer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Cannon v. United States of America et al
as 1:2008cv04930
Plaintiff:
Tyrrall Farrow Cannon
Defendant:
United States of America, Barack Obama, Jesse Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gomis v. US Secretary of State et al
as 5:2008cv03418
Petitioner:
Antoine Gomis
Defendant:
US Secretary of State, US DHS Secretary, US Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Michael Harris v. USDC-CAC
as 08-72418
:
In re: MICHAEL DUANE HARRIS
Petitioner:
MICHAEL DUANE HARRIS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Real Party In Interest:
BARBARA BOXER
Gomis v. United States of America et al
as 5:2008cv02785
Plaintiff:
Antoine Gomis
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Senate, United States House of Representative and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
State of California v. EPA
as 08-1178
Petitioner:
State of California, by and through Arnold Schwarzenegger, Governor of the State of California, the California Air Resources Board, and Edmund G. Brown Jr., Attorney General of the State of California
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor For Petitioner:
South Coast Air Quality Management District
Intervenor For Respondent:
Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, Association of International Automobile Manufacturers, Inc. and National Automobile Dealers Association
Amicus Curiae For Petitioner:
National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL), National Association of Counties, National League of Cities and others
Amicus Curiae For Respondent:
Michael A. Cox, Michigan Attorney General, American Petroleum Institute, Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America and others
State of New York v. EPA
as 08-1179
Petitioner:
State of New York, State of Arizona, State of Connecticut and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor For Respondent:
Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers and National Automobile Dealers Association
Amicus Curiae For Respondent:
American Petroleum Institute, Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America and Utility Air Regulatory Group
Amicus Curiae For Petitioner:
National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL), National Association of Counties, National League of Cities and others
Movant-Amicus Curiae For Petitioner:
City of Sacramento
Movant-Amicus Curiae For Respondent:
John Campbell, United States Representative
Natural Resources Defense Coun, et al v. EPA, et al
as 08-1180
Petitioner:
Natural Resources Defense Council, Sierra Club, Conservation Law Foundation and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Stephen L. Johnson, Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Amicus Curiae For Respondent:
American Petroleum Institute, Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America and Utility Air Regulatory Group
Amicus Curiae For Petitioner:
National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL), National Association of Counties, National League of Cities and others
Movant-Amicus Curiae For Petitioner:
City of Sacramento
Movant-Amicus Curiae For Respondent:
John Campbell, United States Representative
Lindsey et al v. The United States District Court of California et al
as 8:2008cv00074
Plaintiff:
Stephen J Lindsey, - and Patricia Lindsey
Defendant:
The United States District Court of California, All Judges and magistrates Thereof, US Departments of Justice and such departments they represent and others
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
Parviz Karim-Panahi v. Congress, et al
as 2:2003cv00804
Plaintiff:
Parviz Karim-Panahi
Defendant:
Congress, Judiciary/Judges/Attorneys, Government of USA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
