Cases 51 - 60 of 61
Robinson v. Lavalais et al
as 3:2008cv00395
Plaintiff:
Arthur Ray Robinson
Defendant:
Unknown Lavalais, Unknown Conner, Burl N Cain and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Williams v. Cain et al
as 2:2008cv03726
Plaintiff:
Calvin Williams
Defendant:
Burl N Cain
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Stokes v. Cain
as 3:2008cv00806
Plaintiff:
Anthony Stokes
Defendant:
Burl N Cain
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lawson v. Cain et al
as 2:2008cv01246
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lawson
Defendant:
Burl N Cain
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gurganus v. Cain
as 2:2008cv01082
Plaintiff:
Arvel Gurganus
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Defendant:
Burl N Cain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bell v. Cain et al
as 2:2007cv09369
Plaintiff:
Clinton Edward Bell
Defendant:
Burl N Cain
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dabney v. Cain et al
as 2:2007cv09227
Plaintiff:
Allen T. Dabney
Defendant:
Burl N Cain
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parker v. Cain et al
as 2:2007cv08856
Plaintiff:
Kellen Parker
Defendant:
Burl N Cain
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana and Eddie Jordan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stewart v. Cain
as 2:2007cv04072
Plaintiff:
Vincent Stewart
Defendant:
Burl N Cain
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kennedy v. Cain et al
as 2:2007cv03369
Plaintiff:
James Kennedy
Defendant:
Burl N Cain and Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
