Cases 51 - 60 of 72
Cates v. BDA Management , LLC
as 8:2017cv02359
Plaintiff:
Audrey Cates
Defendant:
BDA Management , LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Velasquez v. Cate Star, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv22889
Plaintiff:
Miriam Madrid Velasquez
Defendant:
Cate Star, LLC and Ming Feng Zhuo
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv22367
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Cates-Aquino et al v. Santander Consumer USA, Inc.
as 5:2017cv00098
Plaintiff:
Sherryl Cates-Aquino and Luis Aquino
Defendant:
Santander Consumer USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
SMITH v. CORIZON MEDICAL et al
as 4:2016cv00803
Plaintiff:
JAMES DOUGLAS SMITH
Defendant:
CORIZON MEDICAL, LACY, EDWARDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chanel, Inc. v. ADAM STEBER et al
as 0:2016cv62987
Plaintiff:
Chanel, Inc.
Defendant:
ADAM STEBER, Advance Way, Alexis Christman and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Cate v. Progressive Waste Solutions of FL, Inc.
as 2:2016cv14150
Defendant:
Progressive Waste Solutions of FL, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Cate and Douglas Cate
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Cates v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2016cv00351
Plaintiff:
Judy Burton Cates
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Lee & Cates Glass, Inc. v. North Florida Broadband Authority et al
as 3:2015cv01459
Plaintiff:
Lee & Cates Glass, Inc.
Defendant:
North Florida Broadband Authority, Affiniti Florida I, LLC, National Telecommunications and Information Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Morgan v. Philip Morris USA, Inc. et al
as 6:2015cv01264
Plaintiff:
Suni Cate Morgan
Defendant:
Philip Morris USA, Inc. , R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company , Liggett Group LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
