Cases 51 - 57 of 57
SMITH v. E.D. BULLARD et al
as 2:2008cv60885
Plaintiff:
CHARLES R. SMITH, CHARLES R. SMITH, CHARLES R. SMITH and others
Defendant:
E.D. BULLARD, ATLAS TURNER, INC., ATLAS TURNER, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
SMITH et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS et al
as 2:2007cv73628
Plaintiff:
ROSA MARY SMITH and CHARLES HARRIS SMITH
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS, CELOTEX CORPORATION, EAGLE PICHER INDUSTRIES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
SMITH et al v. AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv66570
Plaintiff:
CHARLES C. SMITH and SHIRLEY SMITH
Defendant:
AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC., AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION, CERTAIN TEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Smith v. State of New Jersey et al
as 1:2007cv01251
Petitioner:
Charles E. Smith
Respondent:
State of New Jersey, Attorney General and Camden County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania et al
as 1:2007cv01192
Petitioner:
Charles E Smith
Respondent:
Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania, Dauphin County Probation and Parole Department and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SMITH v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv61737
Plaintiff:
CHARLES C. SMITH
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., AC AND S, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
SMITH et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2007cv60268
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E. SMITH and HARRIET SMITH
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION, ROCK WOOL MANUFACTURING COMPANY INCORPORATION, KEENE CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
