Cases 51 - 60 of 66
SPRINGS v. STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al.
as 5:2015cv00087
Plaintiff:
DONNIE SPRINGS
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and CORIZON MEDICAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Werdell v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2015cv00353
Plaintiff:
Edward Kenneth Werdell
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections, L. Melendez, D. Andrews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DERKS v. CORIZON MEDICAL, et al
as 5:2015cv00051
Plaintiff:
DERKS and LARKIN DERKS
Defendant:
CORIZON MEDICAL, C DAVIS, RAQUEL SKIDMORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. Trovillion et al
as 8:2015cv00555
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Jenkins
Defendant:
J. Trovillion, Corizon Medical Corporation , M. Profet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kendry v. Craft et al
as 3:2015cv00248
Plaintiff:
Simmie Kendry
Defendant:
I. Kraft , Roach , Corizon Medical Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Werdell v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2015cv00175
Plaintiff:
Edward Kenneth Werdell
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections, L. Melendez, Andrews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGee v. Corizon Medical Group et al
as 3:2015cv00088
Plaintiff:
James Lee McGee
Defendant:
Corizon Medical Group and Doctor Gaspard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ross v. Corizon Medical Services et al
as 3:2014cv01311
Plaintiff:
Dennis Ross
Defendant:
Corizon Medical Services, Secretary, Department of Corrections, Warden, Union Correctional Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01294
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
RANDAZZO v. CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES et al
as 4:2014cv00448
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY RANDAZZO
Defendant:
CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES and MICHAEL CREWS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
