Cases 51 - 60 of 104
Douglas v. Dryzelle et al
as 1:2017cv01120
Plaintiff:
Jamale Douglas
Defendant:
Dryzelle, . Gruel, . Fike and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McQuay v. Smith et al
as 1:2017cv01438
Plaintiff:
Wesley McQuay
Defendant:
Darryl D. Smith, Cermak & Wabash Currency Exchang inc, Nationwide Adjusting Compony and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Lavin v. Reed et al
as 1:2017cv01014
Defendant:
Sam K Reed, Dennis Riordan, Christopher D Sliva and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Lavin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Akerhielm et al v. Combe Incorporated et al
as 3:2016cv01352
Plaintiff:
Steven Akerhielm , Robert Buchanan , Kenneth W. Dunaway, Sr. and others
Defendant:
Combe Incorporated , Combe Products, Inc. , Combe Laboratories, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Seats v. Prentice et al
as 1:2016cv01381
Plaintiff:
Devin Cordell Seats
Defendant:
Major Prentice, Lt. Sortsen, Sgt Tangman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
H. D. Smith, LLC v. VIP Compounding Pharmacy Corp et al
as 3:2016cv03250
Plaintiff:
H. D. Smith, LLC
Defendant:
VIP Compounding Pharmacy Corp. and Pouya Farzadfar
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Smith v. Swap.com
as 1:2016cv07408
Plaintiff:
Tiffany D. Smith
Defendant:
Swap.com
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. United States of America
as 2:2016cv02199
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Markese D Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Ratner v. McNerney et al
as 1:2016cv03589
Plaintiff:
Ratner and Jason Ratner
Defendant:
McNerney, James W. McNerney, Jr., Dennis A. Muilenburg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Presser et al v. The Employee Benefits Investment Committee et al
as 1:2016cv02983
Plaintiff:
Charles Presser , Richard Click , Dale Sauder and others
Defendant:
The Employee Benefits Investment Committee, Gregory D Smith, David A Dohnalek and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
