Cases 51 - 56 of 56
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv06408
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Mercury Vapor Processing Technologies, Inc. v. The Village of Riverdale et al
as 1:2007cv06066
Plaintiff:
Mercury Vapor Processing Technologies, Inc., Mercury Vapor Processing Technologies, Inc., Mercury Vapor Processing Technologies, Inc. and others
Defendant:
The Village of Riverdale, Joyce Forbes, Roy McKinney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Simmons et al v. The Village of Riverdale et al
as 1:2007cv02564
Plaintiff:
Charles Simmons, Jr, Charles Simmons, Jr and Charles Simmons, Jr
Defendant:
The Village of Riverdale, Dennis Reilly, Anthony Fionda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company v. Latino Union of Chicago, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00419
Plaintiff:
Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company, Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company and Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company
Defendant:
Latino Union of Chicago, Inc., Latino Union of Chicago, Inc., Antonia Dempsey and others
Counter Claimant:
Latino Union of Chicago, Inc., Latino Union of Chicago, Inc., Antonia Dempsey and others
Counter Defendant:
Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company, Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company and Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Wilson et al v. Dempsey et al
as 1:2007cv00301
Plaintiff:
Hosie Wilson and McKinley Williams
Defendant:
Daniel Dempsey, Daniel Dempsey, Daniel Dempsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Groff v. Dempsey
as 1:2007cv00191
Plaintiff:
Kate Groff, Kate Groff and Kate Groff
Defendant:
Jack Arnold Dempsey, Jack Arnold Dempsey and Jack Arnold Dempsey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
